Attraction of the New

Sharing is nice

I just got back from California after spending Easter with the family. Good times, restful, and important for reflecting on the distance traveled since last year, and the year before that.

Mt. Hermon was a blast. I met so many great people, people of passion, of ideas, and of incredible faith. I came back with one manuscript I really like, a nonfiction book I hope to acquire in the coming weeks, and some good possibilities for fiction as well. But mainly, I was excited to be representing a company with such a great reputation, a smaller, newer company with a diverse backlist and strong growth year after year.

And now I leave for the Calvin Faith and Arts Festival, my first time to this conference. It’s a huge, daunting place and I wonder if there can possibly be so many of my favorite people in one place–these writers I’ve loved and grown from over the years. I first heard Walter Wangerin when he came to Westmont and spoke. We’d read The Dun Cow, Ragman, and The Book of Sorrows, and everyone was so enamored in their collegiate-sophomoric way. I’m sure it will be no different for me this time. I’m so easily led into new areas of thought by writers like Wangerin, I can’t seem to help myself being a bit bedazzled by that mysterious ability they have to always know just what is the newest thing to discuss at the front of the wave.

I want to suppose though, just for a moment, that even if there was this universally held belief that whatever was newest was the most important thing, what would happen if writers didn’t care about it? Imagine if we all stopped wanting to know what Walter Wangerin or Luci Shaw or Marilynne Robinson thought about current affairs, the state of publishing, or the “emerging” newness of a new Christianity, whatever that might look like. What if we only listened to the old? In fact, if we’re honest, we have to admit there’s no such thing as new. If we lived seeking the old instead of the new, would that change how we’re writing, maybe what we’re writing? Maybe it would change for whom we’re writing too.

I don’t want to jump on a soapbox to denounce the cult of the new. I just think there may be something more to this Christian writing revolution than has really caught on yet. Getting back to the old is the new, and the inescapable fundamentals of life like those in our favorite quotes from Ecclesiastes–those are the real distinctives of a “Christian” kind of writing.

“For what does it profit a man if he should gain the whole world yet lose his soul?” I’m thinking I’ll seek my fortunes in the foundations of life and forget the baubles of the day for a while. See if I start to become irrelevant or out-of-touch. I guess that’s the real fear. But I wonder if that has to be the case–are these mutually exclusive terms?

Whenever I read a book, I try to pay attention to the state of mind I’m in since it has so much bearing on what I get out of the book. Everyone’s had the experience of reading some old book again and finding it completely changed. I wonder what the Calvin conference will have to say about this old vs. new debate. I’ll let you know what I find.

Sharing is nice

6 thoughts on “Attraction of the New”

  1. Sometimes I wonder if these folks who seems to anticipate the next wave are not simply honest observers with the right words to wrap around what they see. Truth never changes, but our perceptions do. And those are shaped by a thousand minute influences. We’re all partially painted, and when someone comes along and splashes just the right color on our canvas, we marvel. The hue isn’t new, but it provides the contrast needed to make sense of our empty places.
    You made a difference at Mount Hermon. I hope the Calvin speakers paint into your life with just the right palette, Mick. Can’t wait to hear about it.

  2. I’d love to be there. What an amazing lineup of writers. Please, somebody report back on all that gets said.
    Wangerin is one of the finest writers of our time. He’s currently undergoing treatment for cancer. Please pray for him.

  3. wow, you’re still here! I thought maybe the baby had taken you away for good.
    And I definitely support you in forgetting the baubles of the day. It’s hard to do, though.
    And I guess it has been in every generation, even though ours seems to be filled with more baubles than others.

  4. You’re back! Hooray!
    Please do fill us in on Calvin. I know we’ll get reports from Dave and Mark, but a third would make it all righty-tighty. (three is a magic number, you know.) And the vicarious experience has it’s own advantages: namely, that we don’t return exhausted and sportin’ a new sinus infection brought on by unfamiliar pollens, altitude adjustments and airport air.
    Have fun!

  5. I recently began to re-read Charles Spurgeon’s “Morning and Evening,” a lovely book with 730 readings (one for each morning of the year and one for . . . well, you get it) and I am amazed anew at how “old stuff” affects me in such new ways. I think that’s why I resonate with much of the ancient-future worship discussions. There is such beauty in the words written in the ages before blogs, PCs and CNN. They seem new and fresh to me when I read them. Go figure.
    Hey, my daughter will be at Calvin. Hope it’s grand.
    Ciao
    Susan :)

  6. Mick,
    It was great to see you at Mount Hermon this year. Thank you for the great laughs and wonderful encouragement. Congrats on your precious little one. Blessings, Susie Larson

Discuss...